By Far The Greatest Team

The football blog for fans of all clubs

Can Sunderland get out of the bottom three?

A three all draw is always more satisfying when your  team has recovered from three nil down than when it has thrown away a  three goal lead. Against West Brom,  Norwich and now Chelsea, we have gone two or more down and fought back. The team’s performances in the latter stages of those games can be seen as causes for optimism, but haven’t in the end produced a single point. That’s certainly the  spin the manager is putting on the outcome of those games, but once Pete Sixsmith has had time for objectivity to kick in he sees worryingly weak team performances achieving too little, too late.

One of the problems with doing a seven-word  summary of each game for Salut! Sunderland (other than the fact that you have had to sit through 90 minutes of a Sunderland game), is that it is usually an immediate response that can be coloured by the way that we end the game.

Yesterday, we finished off strongly and with a modicum of good  fortune, we may well have put The Pensioners under more pressure in the  final quarter of the game. The team were given a generous round of  applause by we members of the crowd who had stayed until the end, and  there were positives to take as we filed out. The word in the Gents was  that if we play like that we should be OK against Reading.

However, as one trooped back to the car and on arrival, put the radio on, the mood began to change. Yes, we played some decent football. Yes, we stung Cech’s hands a few times. Yes, we scored a good goal and hit  the bar and the post, but we also defended like a poor Premier League  side – which is what we are.

What looked like a dreadful decision by Mark Halsey  from high up in the East Stand, becomes a dreadful decision by Seb  Larsson who has form on this kind of thing, his clumsy and unnecessary  challenge on Moses (then of Wigan) contributing to Steve Bruce being  dismissed from his post.

On the drive home, there was also the realisation that Chelsea  stopped playing after 49 minutes. By that time, they were 3 up due to  our inability to either pass the ball to a red and white shirt (Phil  Bardsley gave it away up field), make a sensible challenge in our own  box (see above) or clear our lines (poor old Bardsley again).

As they contemplated a charter flight from Ponteland to Tokyo, the likes of Juan Mata, who was excellent again and the best player I have seen  for a long time, Fernando Torres, whose arrival for the first goal  reminded me of when I watched him as a 16 year old at New Ferens Park  and the busy Eden Hazard must have hoped that Monterey of Mexico will be as accommodating as we were.

Three goals presented to a team who despite their pedigree, are by no means as effective as they have been. As a club they are riven by  dissent, their supporters making it clear that Benitez is as welcome at  Stamford Bridge as the Ghost of Christmas Past was at the premises of  Messrs Scrooge and Marley.

But they have quality players and pace in abundance, which did for us early on. They could have been three up in the first ten minutes,  before eventually scoring in the eleventh. Once that went in, we were  chasing the game and, as any fool knows, we don’t do that.

Our defence, which got us through the early days of the season, is beginning to look distinctly tatty. Phil Bardsley was shocking yesterday. Every error he made was the fault of that well known player S O Else, who failed to read every misplaced  pass, failed to get on the end of every lumped clearance and failed to  do exactly what Bardsley wanted him to do. He was replaced after 75  minutes and I suspect we may not see him again. One of the Lancashire B  clubs may be his next resting place in January.

Carlos Cuellar has been a very good player and would still look  decent at Leicester, Lille or Levante, but he is creaking at Premier  League level. Too many times he ends up making a last ditch tackle or  interception or just not getting there in time, as was the case for  Torres’s opener. O’Shea is of a similar ilk.

The midfield is, as we have been saying since August, pedestrian, particularly through the middle. Mata v Gardner, Hazard v Larsson was  about as equally matched as a wrestling bout between Jimmy Clitheroe and Geoff Capes. Larsson in particular looked ill suited to a central role.

We can take some solace from the two wingers. I thought Johnson did  well in patches – although he gives the ball away so easily. Someone  tell him that we don’t have Yaya Toure to get it back for him.

I also thought that James McClean was as effective as he has been all season. That was maybe because he only had one man up against him, even though that was the reliable Ivanovic. It was a good tussle between the two and I think McClean just about shaded it. First time I have said  that for a while!!

The fact that our best player was a loanee speaks volumes. Danny Rose looked good at full back and, when he moved into midfield, gave us the  pace that we have been crying out for. Will he be there on Tuesday? That could be the defining choice of O’Neill’s tenure at the club.

A win on Tuesday is essential. It will lift us out of the bottom  three, heap the pressure on Reading, who are really struggling and  hopefully, give us the confidence that we need to go on for the rest of  the season. But would you bet on it? Not sure that I would.

Scroll to top